The secrets of successful Baltic ICT startups

I delivered this overview of the Baltic and CEE startup climate at the TechCrunch Nordic meeting in Stockholm on May 27. Thanks to Vlastimil and Steve, who contributed their insights to my presentation.

Two key findings from the event:

  1. Even Scandinavian startups struggle with breaking out to the world, having much better technical and production than sales and marketing talent there. The few that do, often have US people or previous experience from US as part of the team.
  2. The Scandinavians still view CEE countries as something strange and distant, even when we do a lot of cross-border business together. What’s more, even Finland and Sweden are very distant from each other and there is almost no cooperation.

If someone would like to hear more about Baltic startup web and product development opportunities, feel free to get back to me. Besides our company there are tens of great software development companies, small and large, and hundreds of great private developers available.

My Background

I’m a very old man, in Internet years that is. I started with web development and online marketing 15 years ago, back in ‘94, designing the first commercial websites in Estonia.

Since then, half of the years I have been working focused on the local market of my home country, half regionally either across the three Baltic states or ten countries in Central and Eastern Europe.

Half of the time I have been dealing with boring old enterprise IT services, pure corporate & B2B stuff, half with consumer-oriented online services.

Corporate vs Consumer

One thing I have learned is that for startups, depending on what type of person you are, this is a choice each founder and startup has to make: what type of business you want to run.

Servicing the corporate clients has its advantages. In many cases the target groups and customers are easier to identify, market and sell to. The business model and revenue side are easier to be defined, and that can turn into significant revenues already from smaller number of customers. Then again, it does not have the sexiness of telling your friends what you do, having each of them use your services, being well-known on the market, having hundreds of thousands or millions of customers.

For those sexy consumer services, the revenue formula can be non-existent – well, may be not in these times anymore – and target groups hard to market to, as they are just too big. At the same time, many founders do have the urge to service consumers and absolutely hate serving the corporate customers.

Trust your inner feelings and act accordingly. You might be married to your startup for 5-10 years and you don’t want to be doing things you don’t enjoy, at least most of the day.

While many B2B or corporate tech services can be sustainable in smaller countries – not huge, but profitable – it is not so for most consumer services. The markets and revenue streams are just too small. Which brings us to the Baltics.

The Small Baltics

To describe the Baltic attitude, we have to look at what the Baltics are.

Our total population for three countries together is just 7m people, a bit less than Sweden and more than Finland. But each of the countries on its own has a population of just 1-3 million people, which is tiny.

The total GDP of the largest Baltic country, Lithuania, is a third of Finland. Even the total GDP for the three of us is less than in Finland. Besides, the business cultures, nationalities and economies are pretty diverse.

That makes it quite hard for smart people to realise their dreams in our countries, just because of size.

Looking at the online advertising markets in Baltic countries, these are nearing €10 million per year, per country, 90% of which goes to large, stagnant media companies and newspapers, leaving very little online advertising revenues for the startups. The market share of ad networks is tiny as well, most of the money going from top brand advertisers to a few top five sites.

The Baltic Success

At the same time, looking at the technology startup scene, we have done pretty well, especially if you measure the success by exits.

We have had a few large international exits, where the local founding or very early shareholders have made sums of over $50 million each. Most notably these have been two companies, Skype and one of world’s leading casino and online gambling software developers Playtech. I will talk about their models of success and connection to our countries later.

And we have had a multitude of local exits in the range of €10-50 million, mostly to Scandinavian media companies in the field of classifieds, car, real estate and job ads or auctions.

How so?

The Good

The Baltic countries (and this applies to most of Eastern Europe) have a long history of strong real sciences, cybernetics and electronics. Our educational system in these areas has been pretty good, especially in fundamentals like mathematics and physics, which has turned out great for technological problem solving skills.

This is the advantage of the Baltics and Central & Eastern Europe: having IT people and software developers with strong creative skills, coming up with new solutions, innovating. Especially when faced with well-defined problems, the Baltic tech people take a very strong role in how to solve any problem. You define the problem or goal – our people find new or uncharted ways to solve them. That’s the key difference with, for example, many Asian outsourced software developers, where quite often you have to tell them how to solve the problem. This is no selling of programmng hours.

Our creative and imaginative designers, analysts and developers are our greatest asset. So what’s the problem?

The Bad and the Ugly

Let’s say your car engine breaks down. How many of you know how to fix it? Or you have a piece of land and you have to build a house, stone by stone, wood on wood. How long would it take until you learn it?

Each one of us can learn to fix car engines or build a house. The problem is, it takes time, you make mistakes and you learn much faster among people who have fixed cars or built houses. Doing it on your own, only learning from mistakes, can take years and not turn out a very good result. And if there is competition with existing skills, you fail.

Baltic and Eastern European missing skills are the international sales and marketing skills. We build great products. Exceptional products, in many cases. The thing is, we have no idea, how to sell or market them outside our home country, especially in US and Western Europe. Learning international sales and marketing is a cultural and emotional thing and can take years to master. Because of our Soviet heritage, we have none of those skills. Our Estonian top marketing people who have moved from Estonia to run UK or US to run marketing programs for tech companies, say that they have had to learn everything basically from zero. In sales and marketing, we are in a situation like you would need to build a house or fix a car, but have to start learning only from your own mistakes.

This doubles our problems. Our own countries are too small to do anything significant. And going outside is hard, very hard – especially if you have no sales and marketing culture (in addition to no existing contacts) to do that.

Expansion

One of our topics here today is local markets vs international expansion. We all want to go international, not just from the Baltics, but also from the Nordics. But it is very hard to market outside one’s home country.

Back in 2000, I tried to expand my online recruitment company in Estonia simultaneously to around ten countries in Central and Eastern Europe. Big mistake! The idea was great, the execution sucked. It is so easy to stretch yourself thin and lose focus. I would have been much better off and actually making something by choosing two or three key markets and dealt with them. A European country, either small or big, needs a huge amount of focus for an online startup. In many cases you have to do local marketing, local face to face sales, partnerships, customise the product etc. There are only a few exceptions, which can be managed from a distance with little local physical presence. That’s the reason we have very little regional online service chains in Europe.

There’s also a question, where to expand. In Europe you might be much better off risk-wise to choose a few EU countries instead of world dominance. Decreasing risks at the same time decreases rewards.

Cooperation model

How can Baltic and Eastern European startups be successful on world markets? One thing: cooperation with Westerners from day one. We doing product development, people from Western Europe or US handling the sales, marketing and business development side of things.

This has been the model to most success stories in our region: Skype, Playtech, Indextools (acquired by Yahoo), LogMeIn in Hungary, various others. One joint feature for them: East/West partnership from almost day one, both local developers and Western (or Israeli) managers shareholders from very early stage.

For tech startups, remember what I said earlier about the role of developers in our region. This is no outsourced software development. People in our region are the product, in many cases they are the ones defining the product or service with just a little help on defining the customer problem, goals and targets. You all use Skype and I am pretty sure most are happy with an Estonian product.

Here today, I urge all of you to consider this. We need to join forces, taking best bits from each country. Product people go and employ good Nordic sales and marketing people, with international experience. Those people at the same time should come to the Baltics to develop their products.

Baltic VC’s and Investors

From the financing side, I would say the Baltics are in good shape. Our key tech investor is Ambient Sound Investments, the four Estonian Skype founding engineers, now having over €100 million of their own money to invest. We also have MTVP/MartinsonTrigon, with three exited and six existing portfolio companies. Most of this activity is focused in Estonia, with also over 50% of Baltic startups coming from Estonia.

There are also organisations nurturing and connecting startups and entrepreneurs, like Connect Estonia (I am a board member). Both Tallinn and Vilnius have OpenCoffee Club networks.

Baltic Startups

Estonia

Fits.me – biorobotics for fashion, allowing you to take a picture of yourself and a webshop will show a real clothes fit on a biorobot for you – no more ill-fitting clothes! They won the Itechlaw.org pitch contest in Estonia yesterday.

Fortumo – mobile payments, allowing anyone to launch revenue-generating SMS services in 5 minutes in many countries, being also well developed in Scandinavia.

Programeter- analytical information and report automation for controlling and managing software projects.

The whole ASI portfolio.

Please also check out Tigerprises, a blog covering Estonian startups.

Latvia

Relenta- business collaboration Saas or even research chemicals Molport.

Lithuania

GetJar - the world’s most popular mobile application distribution and developer community, funded by Accel Partners.

Conclusion

To sum it up: our product development and financing are well in shape, if we would know how to sell and market, we would be in heaven!

Visit us, talk to us, let’s do things together!

  • Interesting topic, just echoing whats been already said above. The secrets of successful startups (Baltic ICT or any other!) is communication.

    Getting the right communication out is a strategic factor in spreading the message about what it is your company is offering. Get the wrong message out and you wont get the response that you are expecting.

    Communication = Relationships. You need to build both.

    Without successful communication SMEs & Start-ups cannot expect to build successful relationships and therefore increase markets footprints, revenues and partnerships. But herein lies the paradox.

    Many cultures (and countries) still dont invest enough time and patience in understanding the communication and relationships requried to build successful partnerships that lead to great market successes. The are still blocked behind a) traditional views of the market b) antiquated views of the culture/country or c) pre-disposed to do it "My Way" or the highway!

    SMEs and Start-ups are too quick to point failure at an outward reason that has "prevented" them to move forward, but are blind to follow very good advice (such as from Dr. Craig above!) that points to inward changes. As suggested above, 1 x visit to the USA with an effective number of visits, presentations and meetings cannot be compared with the easier and less costly option of emails, faxes and long-distance calls. It all equates to communication! How effective do you want to chase your market? How quickly do you wish to receive responses to your efforts?

    You have to spend money to make money!

    Get close to your customer or partner, give them the chance to get to know you and your company, invest in the time required to build the right relationship & maximise your communication to keep the relationships firm. This approach just may be the difference between your email winding up as SPAM and the one that your future Patrner/customer replies to.

    Val Jelinic
    Business Development Manager
    MNG Europe SA
    www.mng-europe.com
  • An interesting article.

    I have been wondering if Baltic and Eastern European states might become a larger player on the outsourcing market? As a small software company we have lots of calls from India of companies who want us to offshore our software development but none from Eastern Europe.

    I had a small amount of experience of dealing with an Eastern European company which manufactures GPS tracking devices and I must say I was very impressed with their technical knowledge and the way that they conducted themselves. ITs a real shame that unfortunately our project never came off and we never ended up purchasing the devices. I must say though currently our policy is not to outsource overseas at all but if we were to consider based on my experiences I would consider Eastern Europe over India any day of the week.
  • Dr. Craig Shoemaker
    Hi,

    I have served as a Visiting Professor for 10 years at the International Business School at Vilnius University. Often my MBA students have asked me how to do buisness in the USA. They advise that they send e-mails, faxes, etc. to USA companies, distributors, dealers, etc. in an effort to get them to handle their products. They are frustrated as they never even receive a reply. I advise them that USA companies like to build relationships with their suppliers before buying anything. I tell them to line up a month's worth of sales calls in the USA and plan on staying for a month. Their bosses don't understand the American business culture so they don't entertain my comments.

    Craig Shoemaker, Ph.D.
    Professor & Chair
    Department of Marketing
    St. Ambrose University
    Davenport, IA 52804
  • Richard Voda
    Dear Juri,

    Thanks for the great post ! I can relate to many of your experiences, as I am doing business development, mng. consulting, business planning, equity financing to technology oriented SMEs, in Slovakia. I see how many of them fail on international scene, due to suboptimal management, sales & marketing skills. They have no sufficient exposure to international environment thus they do not know how it should be.

    On the other hand, there are examples of successful companies, being at the right time on the right market with exceptional product. The market pull was the driving force, not the quality of sales and marketing. To name few: Sygic - navigation, Innovatrics - biometrics, Eset - digital security, Profesia - online recruitment

    There is also a question if to go on global markets from here. Maybe if the competition at local market is weak, win here rather than fight strong global competition. I am running a small social media start up project. My strategy is to establish strong local roots,... win the customers here, have local market as a product testing bed and then, if market window opportunity exists and product is good-proven expand to Czech Rep or Hungary.

    I like your note on house building, car fixing... The question is why we have these skills? Did division of labor did not take place here?. I guess its the question of trust we have somehow lost in the past, ...we learnt that we do not get what we pay for., so its better to do it on your own...fortunately its getting better as the market forces, rivalry is taking care for quality of the services delivered. And do it yourself approach means lost focus, lost specialization, lost time.

    Best,

    Richard

    Would be great to talk to you more. Let me know if you around
blog comments powered by Disqus